🔗 Share this article

Whenever a major honors show draws close, you'll find a clamor for the addition additional classifications to recognize underappreciated efforts and satisfy the passions of enthusiasts who have specialized interests.

My colleague previously argued supporting a scary games classification. It would be amazing. Equally deserving are strategy board titles, this being a dedicated supporter's campaign. Yet I need to apologize in advance when I prioritize just as with other single-minded supporters, I have a cast-iron argument supporting my request is the most urgent and significant. This is the request: It's essential to create an award type for logic-based games.

Categorizing Game Types

Categorizing art by genre defies precise measurement; it remains highly personal, and typically spark debates concluding with vague boundaries. It's understandable that movie academies don’t do it. However, it represents a necessary evil within the realm of video games, which are so diverse they barely qualify as a single art form.

For comprehensive acknowledgment of interactive entertainment excellence to gain proper attention, while allowing diverse titles to have a chance for representation, classification by type becomes crucial.

Existing Game Classification System

Leading game ceremonies currently feature genre categories for Action, Action/Adventure, RPG experiences, Combat games, Simulation and strategy titles, plus athletic and racing experiences. Together, these award types effectively encompass numerous genres, and you can find room accommodating various experiences.

Different situation exists for logic-based experiences. There’s simply nowhere to accommodate them. Consider three of recent excellent titles, all very different: building puzzles in a particular game, fast-paced pattern recognition in a different title, and the sweetly sociological logic puzzles in another game. What category would fit them within current classifications? Nowhere, that’s where.

The Representation Problem

Numerous examples exist outstanding logic titles released every year without proper recognition at major award shows, except when they manage to fit for categories like Handheld titles, Virtual reality experiences, and the highly challenging small studio competitions.

• A renowned logic title received no recognition in any category in 2014
• Another imaginative release received no nominations during that ceremony
• A beloved organization game received no acknowledgment in 2021
• Just some puzzle games managed to sneak into niche award types

Value of Brain-Teasers

Commonly they're compact experiences, yet the craft in brain-teasers holds tremendous importance. Well-known matching games stand as most popular titles globally maintaining this status for many years.

The iconic tile-matching title challenges popular creative games for the title of most purchased experience; it’s also in the running for best game of all time. Logic titles represent cornerstones to the art of video games, and they are in conversation with almost every other genre.

Proposal and Rationale

Brain-teasers wouldn't encounter that issue. It would be easy to populate multiple candidates engaging, different, qualified experiences each ceremony simply — actually, with challenge, given the need to exclude numerous deserving experiences.

Restating the point, these include experiences lacking appropriate categories during prominent ceremonies. Puzzle game makers are working at the demanding boundary interactive creation, creating some of the purest expressions within interactive entertainment. Just like film action specialists, they merit acknowledgment. Don't make them wait 35 years.