🔗 Share this article

An activist organization has claimed to have harvested millions of songs from Spotify and is preparing to release them online.

Possible Impetus for AI Development

Industry experts said the seeming data breach could aid artificial intelligence firms searching for data to develop their technology.

A group called Anna’s Archive said it had obtained 86 million audio tracks from Spotify and 256 million entries of metadata such as artist and album names. Spotify, which carries more than 100 million tracks, confirmed that the breach did not constitute its entire inventory.

“We have identified and disabled the malicious user accounts that engaged in illegal scraping,” stated a Spotify representative.

The Stockholm-based company, which has more than 700 million subscribers worldwide, added that an investigation into unauthorized access found a external actor scraped public metadata and employed illicit methods to bypass DRM protections.

Group's Stated Mission and Worries

Spotify does not think the audio acquired by Anna’s Archive has been made public yet. Anna’s Archive, which is known for offering links to copyright-infringing books, wrote in a blog it wanted to create a ‘historical repository’ for music.

The group claimed the music files represented 99.6% of all music streamed to by its listeners and would be shared via ‘peer-to-peer networks’, a method of exchanging large digital files online.

“Naturally Spotify doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a fantastic beginning,” commented Anna’s Archive, which describes its mission as “preserving humanity’s information and heritage”.

AI Training and Intellectual Property Debate

Ed Newton-Rex for protecting artists’ rights, remarked the leaked music would probably be utilized for developing artificial intelligence systems.

“Training on pirated data is sadly widespread in the tech sector, so this stolen music is almost certain to be used instructing AI models,” he said.

The group's website alludes to LibGen, a vast online archive of pirated books that has reportedly been used by the parent company of Facebook to develop its AI models.

A founder of an AI startup posted on LinkedIn that individuals of the public could in theory “build their own personal free equivalent of the service”. He said it could also enable technology firms to “educate models on modern music at scale”.

Copyright has emerged as a key issue between creatives, writers and content creators on one side and AI companies on the other.

Policy Proposals and Reactions

Across Britain, artists and writers have protested against a government proposal to allow AI companies use protected work without permission unless the owner signals. Almost every respondent to a government consultation on the idea has supported artists’ apprehensions.

The secretary of state for science, innovation and technology informed parliament this month there was “no clear consensus” on the issue, adding that ministers would “take the time to get this correct”. The administration has committed to make regulatory plans on AI and copyright by next year.